By Setyawati Fitrianggraeni , Reynalda Basya Ilyas and Irvena Ayunya Dewanto

 

1.INTRODUCTION

Cross-border electricity trade is the import and export of electricity between countries.[1] It takes place on a two-way integrated wide-area transmission that enables electricity to be traded throughout the year, a day, or even simultaneously, provided that there are multiple transmission lines (interties) across jurisdictions.[2] Currently, the utilization of cross-border electricity trade has grown in prevalence. One of the most recent projects is the cross-border electricity trading between Singapore and Malaysia through the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Singapore Power and Tenaga Nasional Bhd in 2023.[3] Furthermore, during the Indonesia International Sustainability Forum held on September 2024, the Singaporean Energy Market Authority (EMA) announced that it had granted conditional licenses to five companies, among others, Adaro Solar International and Keppel Energy, to import green electricity from Indonesia.[4] However, in addition to a conditional license, an importer license remains to be obtained and the Government of Indonesia (GOI)’s approval is also required for electricity to be exported from the country.[5] Given the cross-border and highly technical nature of electricity trade projects, it is pertinent to select a suitable dispute resolution mechanism and draft a dispute resolution clause that is tailored to the nature of the project to ensure that business objectives can be achieved.

2. POTENTIAL DISPUTES IN CROSS-BORDER ELECTRICITY TRADE

Arbitration has progressively become the preferred means for the settlement of cross-border disputes involving the energy sector.[6] This is attributable to the characteristic of arbitration which, among others, allows for the enforcement of arbitral awards internationally, the parties’ ability to appoint an expert as an arbitrator, especially, having considered the complex nature of energy contracts, the parties’ autonomy to select the seat of arbitration, the language, the arbitrators, the rules and law that applies to the proceedings.[7]

Furthermore, there are different categories of disputes that may arise in the energy sector, such as:[8] (i) Disputes between states; (ii) Disputes between investor and state; and (iii) Disputes between private parties. However, this article will specifically focus on disputes between private parties, and hence, commercial arbitration.[9] Contractual disputes in the energy sector may stem from: (i) Construction; (ii) Changes in national legislation, which are prevalent having considered that energy contracts tend to span across a long period; (iii) The supply and distribution of electricity;[10]  (iv) Failure in the performance of new technologies, and (v) Joint venture-related disputes.

 

No.	Potential Disputes	Description
1.	Disputes related to construction	Cost overrun, delay, and defect claims, as well as claims pertaining to design and performance.
2.	Disputes related to changes in the national legislation	Breach of contractual claims arising from, among others, procurement agreements, construction contracts, financing agreements, tariff agreements, and insurance agreements, due to changes in renewable energy subsidies, tariffs, or incentives.
3.	Disputes related to the supply and distribution of renewable energy	Delays in the supply of renewable energy, among others, are caused by extreme weather conditions and issues in the grid integration.
4.	Disputes related to technology	Ownership of intellectual property and licensing rights,[11] and the failure of new technologies to perform up to expectations.
5.	Joint venture-related disputes	Disputes between the multiple stakeholders involved in the development and financing of large-scale renewable energy projects.[12]

3. KEY PROVISIONS OF AN ARBITRATION

A well-drafted arbitration clause is particularly beneficial for disputing parties as it reflects how successful, fair, and efficient an arbitration proceeding will be.[13] The key provisions of an arbitration clause, among others, are as follows:

1. Seat

The seat of arbitration is one of the most salient factors to consider in drafting an international arbitration clause. This occurs as the law of the seat of arbitration almost always serves as the lex arbitri, or the law that governs the conduct of international arbitration. The lex arbitri, among others, regulates the procedure for the annulment of an arbitral award, the determination of the competent court in case of a jurisdictional challenge between domestic courts and arbitral tribunals, judicial assistance regarding the constitution of an arbitral tribunal, judicial assistance in ordering evidence-taking, the basis for challenging an arbitrator, and interim measures of protection.[14] Thus, the choice of the seat of arbitration may have significant implications for the possibility of the annulment of international arbitral awards. Additionally, it is important for parties to consider choosing a seat that has a proven track record of supporting the international arbitration process and whether it has ratified the 1958 New York Convention,[15] which can ensure the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards rendered in contracting states.

2. The Applicable Institutional Rules

If the parties to the dispute do not designate an arbitration institution to administer the arbitration under its institutional rules, the parties must develop a set of rules on their own or select the arbitration rules of a particular institution.[16] The key aspect to consider before choosing an institutional rule is the extent to which a dispute can be resolved fairly and efficiently, one of which could be achieved through the flexibility afforded by the institutional rules. Different institutional rules may contain different provisions regarding expedited procedures, the extent of confidentiality, and the timeline for the award to be rendered.

For example, according to the 2025 SIAC Rules, a party may apply for an expedited procedure, if, at the time of the application, the amount in dispute does not exceed the equivalent amount of (a) S$10,000,000 but exceeds the equivalent amount of S$1,000,000;[17] and (b) the amount in dispute does not exceed the equivalent amount of S$1,000,000 and the President has determined under Rule 13.1(b) that the Streamlined Procedure shall not apply to the arbitration.[18] This differs from the provisions of the 2021 Rules of Arbitration of ICC (the “Rules”),[19] which stated that the expedited procedural rules shall apply if the amount in dispute does not exceed US$ 3,000,000[20] upon receipt of the Answer to the Request, or upon expiry of the time limit for the Answer or at any relevant time thereafter, subject to the provision of Article 30(3) regarding the conditions for which the expedited procedure provisions shall not apply.

3. Governing Law of the Contract

The governing law of the contract or lex contractus serves as the substantive law applicable to the merits of the dispute. The existence of the main contract, its validity, and its interpretation are among others the aspects regulated by the governing law of the contract. Before choosing the governing law of the contract, the parties may want to keep in mind that legislative changes in a country’s law pose a high risk of affecting the overall project structure.[21]

4. MULTI-TIERED DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE IN AN ENERGY CONTRACT

Aside from dispute resolution through arbitration, alternatively, the parties may opt for a multi-tiered dispute resolution by including a multi-tiered dispute resolution clause in the energy contract. This clause involves a series of steps in the dispute resolution process and commonly involves alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) as the first step, such as negotiation, mediation or conciliation. If the parties fail to settle the dispute through such means, they may resort to settle their disputes through arbitration.[22] The combination of ADR and adversarial proceedings enables the parties to conduct dispute resolution that is tailored to the needs of their relationship[23] and encourage a positive relationship between them.[24]

Multi-tier dispute resolution clauses are common and enforceable in Indonesia. According to Article 1 Number (10) of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (“Arbitration Law”), ADR is the settlement of disputes outside of the court through consultation, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, or expert assessment.[25] Disputes or differences of opinion are resolved through ADR in a direct meeting by the parties within a maximum of 14 (fourteen) days and the results are stated in a written settlement.[26] In the event that the dispute or differences of opinion cannot be resolved, with a written agreement of the parties, the dispute or difference of opinion shall be resolved through the assistance of one or more expert advisors or through a mediator.[27] If the parties within a maximum of 14 (fourteen) days with the help of one or more expert advisors or through a mediator did not succeed in reaching an agreement, or the mediator did not succeed in bringing the two parties together, the parties may contact an arbitration institution or an ADR institution to appoint a mediator.[28]

Efforts to resolve disputes or differences of opinion through the mediator by upholding confidentiality, within a maximum of 30 (thirty) days must reach a settlement in written form signed by all parties involved.[29] The written settlement is final and binding on the parties, must be registered at the District Court within a maximum of 30 (thirty) days from the signing,[30] and its implementation must be completed within a maximum of 30 (thirty) days from registration.[31] If the reconcilement effort as referred to above cannot be achieved, then the parties based on a written agreement may propose a dispute resolution effort through an arbitration institution or ad hoc arbitration.[32] It should be noted, however, that similar to arbitration, the settlement of disputes through ADR excludes the parties from settling their dispute through litigation in the District Court.[33]

In order to avoid hurdles in the  enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses, however, there must be contractual certainty, which can be attained through the following ways:[34]

1. The use of mandatory words must be clear. For example, “Mediation is condition precedent to arbitration” or by using the word “shall” instead of “may”;
2. The establishment of a specific deadline for the fulfillment of ADR, or a period within which the notification of ADR must be given;
3. The steps to fulfill the ADR must be laid out clearly. For example, the procedure for the appointment of mediators or conciliators; and
4. The clear stipulation of the consequences for the non-fulfillment of the ADR clause. For example, by providing that failure to fulfill the ADR clause prevents the parties from settling the dispute through arbitration or litigation.
5.  Potential Disputes In Cross-Border Electricity Trade

Having considered the infrastructural, logistical, and long-term nature of energy contracts, the potential disputes that may occur in a cross-border electricity trade may arise from: (i) Construction; (ii) Changes in national legislation; (iii) The supply and distribution of electricity; (iv) Failure in the performance of new technologies, and (v) Joint venture-related disputes.

5. Conclusion

1. Potential Disputes In Cross-Border Electricity Trade

Having considered the infrastructural, logistical, and long-term nature of energy contracts, the potential disputes that may occur in a cross-border electricity trade may arise from: (i) Construction; (ii) Changes in national legislation; (iii) The supply and distribution of electricity; (iv) Failure in the performance of new technologies, and (v) Joint venture-related disputes.

2. Key Provisions of an Arbitration Clause

The key provisions of an arbitration clause that are crucial to be included comprise the seat of arbitration, applicable institutional rules, and governing law of the contract, having considered that such components pose significant implications for the overall efficiency and success of arbitration proceedings. The law of the seat of arbitration, among others governs the procedure for the annulment of an arbitral award. Parties may want to consider choosing a seat that has a proven track record of supporting the international arbitration process and has ratified the 1958 New York Convention, to ensure the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards. Further, different institutional arbitration rules offer different features and different degrees of flexibility, which among others, are reflected through provisions on expedited procedures, degree of confidentiality, and time limit for the rendering of an arbitral award. Lastly, the governing law of the contract governs the existence of the main contract, its validity, and its interpretation. Additionally, it should be noted that legislative changes in a country’s law may potentially affect the renewable energy project structure.

2. Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clause In An Energy Contract

Additionally, aside from resolving their dispute through arbitration, the parties may alternatively opt for a multi-tiered dispute resolution. Multi-tier dispute resolution clauses are common and enforceable in Indonesia. However, to avoid hurdles in their enforcement, contractual certainty must be attained, which can be conducted through: (i) Clear usage of mandatory words; (ii) The establishment of a specific deadline for the fulfillment of ADR, or a period within which the notification of ADR must be given; (iii) Clear steps to fulfill the ADR; and (iv) The clear stipulation of the consequences for the non-fulfillment of the ADR clause.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Journal Articles

Antweiler W, ‘Cross-border Trade in Electricity’ (2016) 101 Journal of International Economics <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199616300423?via%3Dihub> accessed 24 January 2025.

Han, B, ‘Dispute Resolution in International Electricity Trade’ (2011) 5 Energy Procedia <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610211013178> accessed 24 January 2025.

Huda, M Sadaqat, ‘Towards a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the ASEAN Power Grid: Best Practices from Europe and Africa’ (2024) 75 ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective <https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2024-75-towards-a-dispute-resolution-mechanism-for-the-asean-power-grid-best-practices-from-europe-and-africa-by-mirza-sadaqat-huda/> accessed 24 January 2025.

Jaberi, Saleh M., Bruno Zeller, ‘Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses in Construction Contracts: A Condition Precedent’ (2024) The International Construction Law Review <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380531739_Multi-Tier_Dispute_Resolution_Clauses_in_Construction_Contracts_A_Condition_Precedent> accessed 13 March 2025.

Kayali, D, ‘Enforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2010) 27 (6) Journal of International Arbitration <https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/27.6/JOIA2010033> accessed 13 March 2025.

Martin, A. Timothy,  ‘Dispute Resolution in the International Energy Sector: An Overview’ (2011) 4 (4) Journal of World Energy Law and Business <https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwr020> accessed 21 March 2025.

Verdias, Mateo, ‘Drafting an Arbitration Clause’ (2017) 31 Revista De Derecho De La Universidad De Montevideo <https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=88946> accessed 21 March 2025.

Laws and Regulations

2021 ICC Arbitration Rules.

SIAC Rules 2025.

Reports

International Chamber of Commerce, ‘ICC Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC, November 2019) <https://iccwbo.org/climate-change-disputes-report> accessed 24 January 2025.

Websites

Aceris Law LLC, ‘Laws Applicable to an International Arbitration’ (2021) <https://www.acerislaw.com/laws-applicable-to-an-international-arbitration/> accessed 24 January 2025.

Basyir, M, ‘Malaysia to Export Renewable Energy to Singapore’ (New Straits Times, 30 October 2023) <https://www.nst.com.my/news/government-public-policy/2023/10/973013/malaysia-export-renewable-energy-singapore> accessed 24 January 2025.

Khan, T, ‘The Growing Need for Arbitration in Energy Disputes’ (SCC Online Times, 14 January 2023) <https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/01/14/the-growing-need-for-arbitration-in-energy-disputes/> accessed 24 January 2025.

Morton, H, ‘Agreements to Agree: Are Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses the Exception?’ (Essex Court Chambers Barristers, 2 October 2018) <https://essexcourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Multi-tiered-resolution-clauses-article-HM.pdf> accessed 13 March 2025.

Yustika, M, ‘Maximizing Reciprocal Benefits from Indonesia’s Green Electricity Export to Singapore’ (Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, 6 March 2025) <https://ieefa.org/resources/maximizing-reciprocal-benefits-indonesias-green-electricity-export-singapore> accessed 21 March 2025.

‘The Rise of Renewable Energy Disputes and Arbitration’ (Stewarts, 26 September 2022) <https://www.stewartslaw.com/news/rise-of-renewable-energy-disputes/> accessed 21 March 2025.

‘Renewable Energy Project Disputes Navigating the Dark Side of the Energy Transition’ (Norton Rose Fulbright, June 2021) <https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/es-es/knowledge/publications/af84f6b1/renewable-energy-project-disputes> accessed 21 March 2025.

Footnotes :

[1] Werner Antweiler, ‘Cross-border Trade in Electricity’ (2016) 101 Journal of International Economics <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022199616300423?via%3Dihub> accessed 24 January 2025.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Mohamed Basyir, ‘Malaysia to Export Renewable Energy to Singapore’ (New Straits Times, 30 October 2023) <https://www.nst.com.my/news/government-public-policy/2023/10/973013/malaysia-export-renewable-energy-singapore> accessed 24 January 2025.

[4] Mutya Yustika, ‘Maximizing Reciprocal Benefits from Indonesia’s Green Electricity Export to Singapore’ (Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, 6 March 2025) <https://ieefa.org/resources/maximizing-reciprocal-benefits-indonesias-green-electricity-export-singapore> accessed 21 March 2025.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Tariq Khan, ‘The Growing Need for Arbitration in Energy Disputes’ (SCC Online Times, 14 January 2023) <https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2023/01/14/the-growing-need-for-arbitration-in-energy-disputes/> accessed 24 January 2025.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Mirza Sadaqat Huda, ‘Towards a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the ASEAN Power Grid: Best Practices from Europe and Africa’ (2024) 75 ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective <https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2024-75-towards-a-dispute-resolution-mechanism-for-the-asean-power-grid-best-practices-from-europe-and-africa-by-mirza-sadaqat-huda/> accessed 24 January 2025.

[9] Baoqing Han, ‘Dispute Resolution in International Electricity Trade’ (2011) 5 Energy Procedia <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610211013178> accessed 24 January 2025.

[10] International Chamber of Commerce, ‘ICC Report on Resolving Climate Change Related Disputes through Arbitration and ADR’ (ICC, November 2019) <https://iccwbo.org/climate-change-disputes-report> accessed 24 January 2025.

[11] ‘The Rise of Renewable Energy Disputes and Arbitration’ (Stewarts, 26 September 2022) <https://www.stewartslaw.com/news/rise-of-renewable-energy-disputes/> accessed 21 March 2025.

[12] ‘Renewable Energy Project Disputes Navigating the Dark Side of the Energy Transition’ (Norton Rose Fulbright, June 2021) <https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/es-es/knowledge/publications/af84f6b1/renewable-energy-project-disputes> accessed 21 March 2025.

[13] Mateo Verdias, ‘Drafting an Arbitration Clause’ (2017) 31 Revista De Derecho De La Universidad De Montevideo <https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=88946> accessed 21 March 2025.

[14] Aceris Law LLC, ‘Laws Applicable to an International Arbitration’ (2021) <https://www.acerislaw.com/laws-applicable-to-an-international-arbitration/> accessed 24 January 2025.

[15] A. Timothy Martin, ‘Dispute Resolution in the International Energy Sector: An Overview’ (2011) 4 (4) Journal of World Energy Law and Business <https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwr020> accessed 21 March 2025.

[16] Han, ‘Dispute Resolution in International Electricity Trade’ (n 8) 2209.

[17] SIAC Rules 2025, Article 14.2 letter (a).

[18] Ibid, Article 14.2 letter (b).

[19] 2021 ICC Arbitration Rules, Article 30 paragraph (2).

[20] Ibid, Appendix VI, Article 1, paragraph (2), this provision applies if the arbitration agreement under the Rules was concluded on or after 1 January 2021.

[21] Han, ‘Dispute Resolution in International Electricity Trade’ (n 8) 2209.

[22] Helen Morton, ‘Agreements to Agree: Are Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses the Exception?’ (Essex Court Chambers Barristers, 2 October 2018) <https://essexcourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Multi-tiered-resolution-clauses-article-HM.pdf> accessed 13 March 2025.

[23] Didem Kayali, ‘Enforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2010) 27 (6) Journal of International Arbitration <https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/27.6/JOIA2010033> accessed 13 March 2025.

[24] Morton, ‘Agreements to Agree: Are Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses the Exception?’ (n 17) 1.

[25] Law 30/1999, Art. 1 Number 10.

[26] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (2).

[27] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (3).

[28] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (4).

[29] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (6).

[30] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (7).

[31] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (8).

[32] Ibid, Art. 6 Paragraph (9).

[33] Ibid, Art. 6 par. (1).

[34] M. Saleh Jaberi, Bruno Zeller, ‘Multi-Tier Dispute Resolution Clauses in Construction Contracts: A Condition Precedent’ (The International Construction Law Review, April 2024) <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380531739_Multi-Tier_Dispute_Resolution_Clauses_in_Construction_Contracts_A_Condition_Precedent> accessed 13 March 2025.

DISCLAIMER :

This disclaimer applies to the publication of articles by Anggraeni and Partners. By accessing or reading any articles published by Anggraeni and Partners, you acknowledge and agree to the terms of this disclaimer:

No Legal Advice: The articles published by Anggraeni and Partners are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. The information provided in the articles is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between Anggraeni and Partners and the reader. The articles should not be relied upon as a substitute for seeking professional legal advice. For specific legal advice tailored to your individual circumstances, please consult a qualified attorney.

Accuracy and Completeness: Anggraeni and Partners strives to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information presented in the articles. However, we do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, currency, or completeness of the information. Laws and legal interpretations may vary, and the information in the articles may not be applicable to your jurisdiction or specific situation. Therefore, Anggraeni and Partners disclaims any liability for any errors or omissions in the articles.

No Endorsement: Any references or mentions of third-party organizations, products, services, or websites in the articles are for informational purposes only and do not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Anggraeni and Partners. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy, quality, or reliability of any third-party information or services mentioned in the articles.

No Liability: Anggraeni and Partners, its partners, attorneys, employees, or affiliates shall not be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, or special damages arising out of or in connection with the use of the articles or reliance on any information contained therein. This includes, but is not limited to, loss of data, loss of profits, or damages resulting from the use or inability to use the articles.

No Attorney-Client Relationship: Reading or accessing the articles does not establish an attorney-client relationship between Anggraeni and Partners and the reader. The information provided in the articles is general in nature and may not be applicable to your specific legal situation. Any communication with Anggraeni and Partners through the articles or any contact form on the website does not create an attorney-client relationship or establish confidentiality.

By accessing or reading the articles, you acknowledge that you have read, understood, and agreed to this disclaimer. If you do not agree with any part of this disclaimer, please refrain from accessing or reading the articles published by Anggraeni and Partners.

 

For further information, please contact:

WWW.AP-LAWSOLUTION.COM

P: 6221. 7278 7678, 72795001

H: +62 811 8800 427

 

S.F. Anggraeni

Managing Partner

[email protected]

 

Reynalda Basya Ilyas

Managing Associate

[email protected]

 

Irvena Ayunya Dewanto

Junior Associate

[email protected]